Friday, May 15, 2026

Index - of sorts anyway. Think of it as a guide. 15/05/2026

 Bikes



Clutch


Electrical

Using an Ignitech TCIP4 on a Ducati ie engine converted to carburettors - running the "Ducati 48-2" programming.


Engines and Dyno runs


Exhaust


Maintenance


Suspension



Tuning - Carby

Tuning - Fuel Injection


Moto Guzzi


Cagiva


MV Agusta


Stuff


.

Using an Ignitech TCIP4 on a Ducati ie engine converted to carburettors - running the "Ducati 48-2" programming.

I recently fitted a 2007 Monster 695 engine into a 90's M600, and used an Ignitech TCIP4 ignition unit running the "Ducati 48-2" programming to run the ignition.  There's a video on setting it up on my Youtube channel here - Using an Ignitech TCIP4 unit to run a Ducati fuel injected engine converted to carbs - M600. - dealing with an issue I was anticipating, and this is the mentioned blog post with all the maps in an easier to follow (easier to present anyway) format.

The fuel injected engines that originally ran 1.6M, 1.5M or 59M/5AM ECU all use a single pick up / crank angle sensor / rotation sensor running on the timing gear teeth on the LH side of the engine mounted in the alternator cover, or in the crankcases in the 08> ish engines like my M659 engine I'll be fitting this system to in the hopefully near future.

While many of these engines still have the bosses cast into the cases for the carb model Kokusan pick up plate, the holes usually aren't drilled and tapped and, more importantly, there's no big hole to get the wires out.  Meaning using the ie sensor with an appropriate ignition system is the easier way to go.

The Ignitech TCIP4 used in this instance is not the same as the TCIP4 to suit Kokusan ignition.  Not sure how (that's way above my knowledge grade), but I'm assured that internally, they're not the same.  So you need to order the TCIP4 specifically for this application.

It comes with a cable to suit the 3 pin sensor connector, plus 4 other wires for power, earth, horizontal coil trigger and vertical coil trigger.  In this instance, horizontal is cylinder 1 (orange wire), vertical is cylinder 2 (white wire).  I even drew a picture to work out which was which and still got it wrong - after I'd made a loom up for it to work.  Luckily, the terminals are easy to get out of the TCIP4 connector, and I just swapped them over between pins 1 and 10.

I used a relay supplying battery voltage directly to power the TCIP4, as the voltage at the 2 pin connector in the bike's loom was 2V plus down on battery voltage with the coils disconnected and not drawing any current.  I've done this to a few carby model Monsters and SS recently, and it's well worth checking if you've got a poor starter.

I'll be showing the 3 pages of the software that are applicable to this set up discussion - "Miscellaneous", "Bike" and "Advance Map".  While you can certainly run other features found on the other pages, such as a TPS or IAP input (well worth doing if you can) to run a 3D spark advance map, it's not important to what I'm showing here. 

I'll be highlighting the bits I'm talking about in purple.  With these units, I tend not to touch things I don't fully understand or need to.  Much less self induced complication that way.
 
As ever, if you want a deeper guide to using the Ignitech TCIP4, get the manual from Liam at Fast Bike Gear > Ignitech Manual.

The supplied map is as follows.  I did try running this map briefly, with the result I had expected.




I tend to make some basic changes to the supplied regardless.  I always drop the rev limiter, and in this instance went to 9500 RPM and then later 9000 just to be safe, and a long manifold engine isn't going to be doing much worthwhile over 9k anyway.


I like the "Revolutions without ignition" function, as it gets the engine spinning nicely before trying to fire it.  I started at 2, but went back to 1 later on to reduce the cranking time.  You can hear it when cranking.


I had a look at the M695 ignition map, which on the WOT column goes up to 40 degrees at higher RPM


but I figured 38 would be enough.  The flat section of 8 degrees between 600 and 1400 RPM I do for stability of idle RPM, especially ensuring the engine returns to idle nicely.  I would usually go 1500 RPM, or maybe higher if it was holding up at all (it wasn't).  The reverse taper between 800 and 1100 RPM in the original map above can help with idle on a cold engine, and I use that later.  But at this point in the playing, it was all about finding stability of timing - which was the problem - and not trying to be tricky.  Basics first, fancy later.

This is the map used in the first video of the engine running, and the timing was erratic, as I had expected. 


I think, about this point, I flattened the advance out at the bottom to 0, with 0 base advance, and checked that this gave me firing at TDC, which it did.  And stable, because base and map being the same does that.  But then, just playing for I'm not really sure why, I changed the base advance to 6 and nothing else and tried that.  And that's when I sort of noticed (remembered for later) that the timing, while showing at 6 degrees ATDC on the timing light, was stable.  The 6 degrees ATDC was, once seen, completely "as expected".  It was an idea to see what would happen, and often the random change playing can teach you as much as anything else.  Just need to be observant and accept any result as valid.

I don't have the map on file though, so can't show what I actually did.  I tend not to save things on the fly, leading to confusion later when I'm trying to remember it all.  I did try to recreate it when writing this, but found that moving the base advance to 6 would sometimes, but not always move the advance map to 6 degrees at the bottom.  So I'm not exactly sure why it let me do it now.

And then, I went on a different tack.

The way the Ignitech works is, the base advance is the defining "zero reference" point, for want of a better term.  If your map has 10 degrees base advance, and the maximum is 36 degrees, then what really happens is that the Ignitech adds 26 degrees to the base trigger point for the max advance.

That may sound a little captain obvious, but it's important.  On the TCIP4 Kokusan replacement units I sell most of, the map as supplied by Ignitech is wrong.  They have 36 degrees max advance, but the base and idle advance are both 10.  Which means, in practice, that the unit adds 26 degrees to the trailing edge of the flywheel lump.  The problem being, that's always 6 degrees BTDC on the carby engines.  Therefore, where you think you're getting 36 degrees max advance, you're actually only getting 6 + 26 = 32 degrees.  So base advance matters, and if it's wrong, then everything else is offset by the amount it is wrong.

As such, it's also a point you can manipulate for your own ends.  I figured I wanted to make the tooth before the specified start advance the new start advance, which is 15 degrees BTDC.  But to do that, and thinking on the fly, I changed the "Start advance" numbers from 23 to 22 and 41 to 40 and then, with the base advance at 0 (even though it was 15 degrees BTDC) I subtracted 15 degrees of all the map values to make sure the timing above idle still lined up as before.  ie, 0 = 15 degrees, 23 = 38 degrees.



Which, when checked with the timing light, gave a stable 15 degrees BTDC at idle and 38 degrees max.  As expected.  Then, realising I was making the whole thing much more complicated that necessary, I made the base advance 15 degrees (because it was), put the map back to the desired numbers (added 15) and tried it again.  With exactly the same timing on the light, but the important numbers reflecting the reality of what I was doing.  As below:


The next step from that was changing the timing at idle, dropping it back to 7 degrees between 600 and 1500 RPM.  Initially, I wasn't expecting this to work (neither was Liam), but based on what had happened previously, I was hoping this was going to give me a nice stable 7 degrees.  Conveniently, it did.  




Then, I tried something else.  I'm not sure what prompted it now - maybe I was having a look through Liam's guide - but I was looking at the "Bike" page and saw the "2nd edge" thing and thought "hmmm".  


What the "2nd Edge" box does is tells the unit to trigger / sense / whatever it does at the end of a pulse, not the start.  Given we're using the teeth on the gear here, the 1st Edge of the tooth and the 2nd Edge are not that far apart.  the teeth on the gear are 15 crankshaft degrees apart from 1st Edge to 1st Edge (or 2nd Edge to 2nd Edge), so depending on where on the side of the tooth the sensor is reading, the difference between 1st and 2nd Edge has to be less than 15 degrees.  On my M659 engine that will be getting one of these 48-2 units, it will be reading the ends of the teeth as the sensor is in the crankcase above the gear, not pointing at the side through the alternator cover as this M695 is.  So, in that instance, the difference between 1st Edge and 2nd Edge will be less.

But this also brings the need to set the Base advance accurately, so I tempted fate and put my hoped for 7 degrees in the Base advance box, then fired it up and checked the advance with the timing light.  The maximum advance tells you if you have the base right, and it was good.  And stable and all that, because it's realistically exactly how we set the carby engines up - base advance is the last trigger point. 

So this is definitely another valid way of achieving the desired result.  Probably the most valid.  

 


But that's not where I left it.  I went back to the previous map basis, because I wanted to get a little fancy.  Initially, the map in the unit had a reverse taper curve around the idle speed.  I reused that idea, but with a couple of changes.

When the engine is cold, one way to help prop up the idle speed is to add more advance.  There are limits to how well it works, but generally, it's a pretty good way to get around an issue, especially when you have "choke" functions that are really separate enriched bypass circuits.  What is enough fuel to make them fire up from cold fairly quickly becomes too much, and they richen up, start chugging and blowing black smoke, then stop.  With the advance as below, the bike would idle cold quite well without choke not long after firing.  Realistically, as long as it doesn't stop, it's fine.

The trick to this is to make the RPM you want the idle at hot at the end of the reverse taper, and then have a plateau for a few hundred RPM so that 1/ there's no incentive for the RPM to creep up as it becomes happier, and 2/ it will return to idle nicely without holding up.  As it was initially, if the engine picks up advance with RPM, the idle speed will rise with engine heat as it becomes more efficient, and will be less likely to return to the desired idle speed after revving.  Generally, 1500 RPM seems to be a good point to start the advancing.

You can start the reverse taper at a lower RPM, but 900 is probably the lowest it's going to idle successfully at, and you want as much as possible at that.  You could start the reverse taper at 1000 RPM if you wanted to try it - it's all about making it work, and simply put, what works is good.

Or you could drop the advance at idle from 7 to 5 or 4 degrees, which would require winding the idle screw in some more to give the desired hot idle, so the reverse taper should be more successful.  All depends what works best.

One point on that - the amount of advance you run will impact the throttle opening you need at idle.  More advance equals less throttle opening.  The problem there is that carbs generally have a small range of throttle opening at idle that they work best at.  Because they run transfer ports that help the mixture as you go from closed throttle (pilot circuit) to low throttle (needle circuit) running, if the throttle blade is in markedly the wrong place at idle, the pilot circuit outlet and transfer ports will be in the wrong place and you might get off idle weirdness, etc.  That's why I'd go for the 7 degrees advance at idle here - it should put the throttle blade in about the expected place.





.

Thursday, May 14, 2026

Removing the fuel cap lock barrel out from a Ducati fuel cap - in this case a recently purchased spare part for a 916.

I'm starting the process with the cap locking pin and cap seal removed, because that's the easy part and I wasn't thinking too much about photos.  I do have a Youtube video about fuel cap reassembly.  Does Youtube let you play videos in reverse?  That'd be handy.

Anyway, once you've got that shit off, slide off the silver washer you can see in the blur at the top of the photo, the cap seal and the 4 springs and you're left with this:



That's just a thin washer.  Remove.




Then there's a black o-ring.  Remove - I had to use a wee pick to get under it.




Under the o-ring is another steel ring, this time much thicker and harder to get out.  Strong magnet is probably the best bet.  Maybe not banging it on the bench hard.  You don't want to wreck anything.




And then, you get to the important part - the little lock tab.  The gold bit in the yellow circle, in case you're not familiar with this sort of thing.  This is what holds the lock barrel in.  Get in there with the wee pick, push it in and the barrel will slide out the other side.  Having a key in the lock is a good idea, that way all the wafers don't spring out and piss off and cause a tanty.



Saturday, October 4, 2025

Ducati 1098 Rear brake disc screws coming out and making a mess

Earlier this year I had a 1098 in for a 12,000km service - it was a bit early, with 9,400 on the speedo - and when I went for the after work road test, just up the road I got a really odd clunk from the rear wheel area.  Figuring I'd better stop and have a looksee, I found one of the rear disc screws come out and making a mess.






On closer inspection, the big circlip that holds the rear brake caliper bracket onto the rear hub snout wasn’t there.  Not even a hint of it.  There’s only one way to get that clip on and off, which involves removing the axle.  If it was going to force its way out otherwise, it’d be leaving some trace for sure.

 Possibly, my work at the service – unbolting the caliper to flush and bleed fluid and refitting it with the pads pushed back – caused the big flat washer to move around as it hadn’t previously, and that brought it into the path of the screw which had wound itself out.  Not sure.  But all the better for finding it out.

When I removed the caliper I could see some damage on the inner side, and the inner pad material just fell off.

So I ordered a new disc screw, big flat washer and circlip, and removed the axle to fit it all up.  Loctited and torqued all the screws in to 25Nm, and fitted it all back up with a new set of pads.

Recently, I had another, with 11,500km on the odo.  Nothing like the previous mess, but it just looked to me like the screws weren't tight enough.

The main issue here is the lack of access. I did manage to get my cut off 5mm hex key in there to at least feel that yes, it was loose. But with no access to tighten properly, let alone remove, re-loctite and refit with torque, the only option is pulling the axle out and sticking it in the vice. Which is really not that hard to do, although you can say that in hindsight when you haven't had to wail the living crap out of the axle to get it out. Certainly had to do that with a few MV over the years.

I did put some black texta marks on 3 of the 4 screws (didn't think of it at first) just to see how much movement I was getting. They are a fine thread M8 torqued to 25Nm, but they were all tighter run by hand than they had been. Looks like a good 30 - 45 degrees, so well worth taking the time to do.




The white paint pen marks should be durable enough longer term to show any future loosening. Not that I expect it to.

Something to be checked for sure.

Friday, October 3, 2025

Ducati 749 999 fluid bleeders inside the front brake and clutch fluid reservoirs.

If you're servicing a Ducati 749 or 999, there are bleeders inside the front brake and clutch fluid reservoirs to bleed the radial master cylinder. Being radials, they angle up from the fluid entry to the fluid exit, and so trap air at the top.

Just don't open them with the lever pulled in - you'll get wet.
As below. The 6mm black hex in the middle.

Often, the clutch fluid coming out will be quite manky. I fill the reservoir up, then push a few lever pulls of dirty fluid out, stopping once the dirty fluid gets down toward the fluid inlet. Suck all the fluid out, start again. After a few cycles, the fluid being pumped out should clean up nicely.

On the brake side, I push the pads back to force the fluid back through the system into the reservoir. Cracking the bleeder while pushing the pads back will force any air in there straight out into the reservoir.



Wednesday, August 27, 2025

Things that can cause a dragging clutch.

I've long intended to make a video about Ducati dry clutches, but the opportunity has evaded me thus far.  I do have a written "diagnosis" sheet which I'll neaten up and post here so I can link to it easily.  I'll steal some photos from the net to fit the points.  As follows:

If you can't select neutral with the engine running, but it's easy with the engine off, it means the clutch is dragging.  Simple as that.

IME, things that can make it drag, from the top:
 
Air in the system.  Not as hard to bleed as many make out.  If it's hard to bleed, turn the bars to the right and tilt the bike over so that the tip of the lever is the highest point and gently pull the lever in and out.  This will work any air in the hose up to the master and out.  If it's a coffin style master you can spray fluid everywhere doing this, so maybe put the cap on.  Or cover the bodywork, screen, dash, etc first.  Big plastic bags work well.  

You can feel the lever get harder if there's air coming out.  Slow pulls, a few fast, slow, tap the hose, make sure there's no high point loops in the hose, etc.

Some people add bleeder nipples at the master cylinder outlet and bleed there as well.  Never seen the need myself - I just lean the bike over to the right more.  

You can use a syringe to push fluid in from the slave bleeder and up to the top.  Certainly one way to do it, and may dislodge air you can't get to otherwise (possibly more brake based, especially ABS unit).  Just don't make a mess as it comes out the top.

I use a vacuum bleeder to suck the fluid through, as it's faster and works well.  But there's nothing wrong with just opening the bleeder and pumping the lever to push the fluid through.
 
Worn lever pivot.  Either the hole in the lever or the actual pin itself.  With the older style large hollow pin lever pivot, the pins can wear a lot on bikes that don't get lubed, as can the lever.  You can remove the pin, clean and lube and spin it 180 degrees to get a fresh side.  On these masters, the pin pushing the piston can also wear shorter.


On masters with the smaller, solid pin, the barrel on the end of the piston pushrod can wear in the lever, I've seen lots almost worn through the lever.  

The piston pushrod itself screws into the barrel, and underneath there is a grub screw that locks the pushrod in place.  If the grub screw is loose, the pushrod will generally wind itself out, increasing the free play.  Often, with replacement levers this grub screw is loose or not there, so always check that.
 
Conversely, if you want to adjust or remove the pushrod, you need to make sure the grub screw is loose.  It’s a 1mm hex key, so tiny.  and sometimes loctited in, so you might need some heat to make it move.  Can be infuriating.



Crap aftermarket levers.  Either giving excessive free play or no free play.  Might be adjustable, maybe not.  Some of the crap I see is just truly craptacular.  
 
Also, make sure you actually have free play.  And that the piston is returning to the end of its stroke and opening the compensating port.  That’s the little hole closest to the lever end.  B in the photo below.  If fluid can’t flow out of the system, it also can’t get in, and this can cause issues as well when trying to bleed.  If in doubt, give it as much free play as possible, or even remove the lever to see if that suddenly changes the feel, or drops the fluid level.  The fluid should rise a little when you pull the lever in.  On coffin masters, it’ll spurt fluid out of the compensating port, so be careful.

I've brought up the free play thing many times on forums, etc, and lots of people just don't get it.  Or get very offended, like I've insulted their manhood.  Seriously - make sure you have free play.  Add more, just in case it helps.  If I have one that just won't bleed, I often remove the lever to make sure.  Even if it was fine last week - add more free play.  You'd be amazed how many times it just works.


This is the adjuster on a big pivot lever.  From the factory they often had the flat blade screwdriver slot in the end of the adjuster filled with glue so you couldn't adjust it and mess it up.


Aftermarket clutch slaves.  Usually have a larger in piston diameter, increasing the hydraulic ratio to soften the lever, but decreasing the slave piston travel correspondingly.  It's a ratio trade off.  If the slave is a lot larger, the pressure plate might not be lifting far enough.  Move the lever out, pull it in further, etc.
 
While not really drag specific.  Worn pushrods, slave pistons and seized pushrod bearings in the pressure plate.  The seized bearing will spin the pushrod and it'll wear away and into the piston.  I had a 900ss in once that the owner had had long time clutch issues with from new (tip - it's not the bike, it's you) when it was maybe 15 years old.  It needed a new pack and once fitted I pumped the lever and the slave piston and pushrod were so worn that the piston popped out of the slave body.  Scared the shit out of me when it went bang.
 
Warped steel plates.  There should be 1 x 1.5mm "spring" steel plate, which is conical and if you put it on a flat surface and press the outer edge (if it's the right way up) the opposite edge will lift.  The 7 friction plate pack pre 1100/1098 models had would also have 8 x 2mm flat steel plates.  The thickness of those packs from Ducati is nominally 38.5mm.  The 1100/1098> packs with 8 frictions and 10 steels will usually have some 1.5mm flat steel plates to reduce the overall thickness due to the extra plates. From memory they're around 40.5mm, but done hold me to that.  Pack thickness itself, as long as it's not stupid either way, isn't an issue IMO.  Less thickness reduces spring preload and thereby lever effort.  More thickness and the friction plates might come out the end of the basket and not go back in.

Using a very flat surface, check the rest of the steel plates to see if any of the other plates behave like the spring plate, flipping them to check both sides.  If they do, they're warped and need replacing.  You can't get around them being warped.  You may also find someone has fitted more than 1 of the 1.5mm spring plates for some reason, valid or not.  There was a DP slipper for 1198 that liked 4 of them.  Really don't understand how it worked without dragging like crazy, but I've done it, so I know it was fine.

As above, there are also flat 1.5mm steel plates, used in the 1098 onwards 8 friction plate packs and the Surflex sintered 8 friction plate packs that used to come in SP / SPS/ R models, so don't think any and all 1.5mm steel plates are springs.  Unless you have a stash of good steel plates, the only place to get them is a new complete pack.  OEM, Barnett, Ducabike, Newfren, Adige and Surflex all make packs.  Aluminium plates in a steel basket will make the plates sacrificial - it's what I tend to do these days.
 
Hub wear  - the centre part the plates go over.  Watching from above, pull the lever in and see if the spring caps move outwards as the lever free play takes up, then stop and then the pressure plate starts lifting off the pack.  If so, the large star like washer at the front of the hub is eating its way into the hub.  Pretty common.  You can add another washer (i've seen up to 4) or replace the hub if it's very worn.  The original hub centre is a rubber block cush drive assembly, so it will move a little when ok, but only a little.  If you remove the pressure plate and pack and push the hub backwards you can usually see the wear there.



 
Basket and hub groove wear.  I really don't agree that wear in the basket or hub grooves makes any real difference to how the clutch disengages.  At all.  I have a customer who bought a bike that some idiot had put steel plates into an aluminium basket just before he bought it, and 50,000km later the plates had eaten their way quite a few mm into the basket.  It was all absolutely rooted, but still perfectly functional and lovely to use.  Loud as hell though.

Aluminium baskets that have had aluminium friction plates in them will have a burr on the inside of the basket grooves where the basket has been peened by the plates.  I usually scrape that off - it comes off fairly easily with the carbide scraper.  Not sure if it really makes any difference.
 
Sometimes, the peened out bits of the tangs on the friction plates as in the picture below can get between the steel plates and hold the pack apart and make it slip.  Just grind the peened out bits off and stick it back in.  


To diagnose.  Start at the top and work your way down.  It might be a combination of issues, so don't stop until you've checked it all and fixed every problem you come across.